In the current branding landscape, some brands find themselves developing cult-like followings, often without deliberately aiming for this level of devotion. These followings tend to emerge organically, fueled by a combination of strategic elements, psychological triggers, and socio-cultural factors. From limited-edition products to lifestyle alignment, brands stumble into these followings by inadvertently triggering a mix of emotional and psychological responses within their consumers.
In this blog, we will delve into the psychology behind why some brands develop such followings, explore the tactics (intentional or accidental) they use, and analyze real-world examples, including the Stanley Cup craze of 2024. Additionally, we’ll look at how this consumer obsession ties into broader psychological phenomena like the "dopamine tax," offering an exploration of how brands capture hearts and minds.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
At its core, a brand with a cult following fosters an emotional bond so strong that consumers feel a deep sense of identification with it. These brands transcend their function and become symbols of identity, status, and emotional fulfillment. To understand how cult followings form, we must consider a few key psychological principles:
These psychological principles are key to understanding the rise of brands that unintentionally create cult-like followings. Now, let’s dive deeper into how specific brand strategies tie into these principles, either deliberately or accidentally.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
Many brands foster a sense of community, sometimes without realizing how powerful this can be. When consumers see others who share their passion for a brand, it reinforces their identity and their connection to it. Communities often emerge through social media, where fans of the brand congregate, share experiences, and exchange stories. This engagement builds a powerful, self-reinforcing loop where the brand becomes central to these consumers’ lives.
Take Supreme, for example. What began as a niche skateboarding brand has evolved into a global cultural phenomenon. Supreme never explicitly built its brand around the idea of community, yet it fostered one through its culture of exclusivity. The limited runs of its products, paired with its association with skateboarding culture, created a cult following where owning a Supreme product meant inclusion in an exclusive club. People began to identify themselves as part of the "Supreme community," even though the brand never directly engineered such belonging.
Scarcity is a powerful tool in creating desirability, and many brands use it—consciously or unconsciously—to drive their cult status. Limited-edition releases, seasonal collections, or restricted access to certain products tap into the psychology of scarcity, causing consumers to feel that if they don’t act quickly, they’ll miss out on something rare. The fear of missing out (FOMO) is particularly strong in today’s hyper-connected world, where consumers see others acquiring something they cannot get.
The Stanley Cup craze of 2024 is a prime example of this phenomenon in action. What started as a celebration of the long-standing Stanley Cup tradition transformed into an unexpected consumer frenzy. A limited-edition series of Stanley drink cups were released to commemorate the 2024 Cup Finals. This series, intended to be a nostalgic nod to the sporting event, was produced in limited quantities, which triggered massive demand. Suddenly, fans were queuing up, paying overinflated prices on resale platforms, and treating the cups as rare collectibles. Social media played a massive role in magnifying the craze, as influencers and fans shared their purchases, deepening the desire for these now-scarce items.
What happened here was an unintentional blend of exclusivity, nostalgia, and FOMO—resulting in a cult-like rush for these products. This taps directly into the dopamine system: the anticipation of securing something scarce and valued heightened excitement, which led to an even stronger consumer attachment to the brand.
A significant factor behind cult brand followings is how well a brand aligns with personal or societal values. Consumers today are more values-driven than ever, and when a brand embodies the same ideals—whether environmental responsibility, social justice, or creative freedom—it becomes an extension of the consumer's identity.
Take Patagonia, for example. While the brand certainly focuses on sustainability, it did not initially set out to create a cult following. However, through its consistent messaging about environmental conservation, its customers began to align their personal identity with the brand’s mission. Patagonia’s transparency about its supply chain, activism efforts, and focus on "buying less" tapped into its customers’ core values. Over time, consumers weren’t just buying Patagonia products; they were buying into a lifestyle and a set of principles. This identity alignment has led to Patagonia’s cult-like status, even among consumers who are not traditionally outdoorsy.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
One of the more intriguing aspects of consumer behavior is how the brain processes rewards, particularly through the release of dopamine. While dopamine gives consumers that rush of pleasure when they anticipate a purchase, it also imposes what is known as a dopamine tax. This concept refers to the diminishing returns that consumers experience after the high of their initial purchase.
The dopamine tax plays a significant role in how cult followings evolve. As brands continue to deliver highly anticipated products or experiences, the consumers' dopamine response is taxed over time—they need more novelty, more exclusivity, or more alignment with their identity to achieve the same level of pleasure. Brands that fail to meet this escalating demand may find their once-devoted followers moving on to the next dopamine-inducing experience.
The Stanley Cup craze once again provides a compelling example. While consumers were initially ecstatic about securing the limited-edition Stanley Cups, the heightened anticipation for new releases soon took a toll. The subsequent iterations of the product, while still popular, failed to generate the same dopamine spike as the first edition. The novelty had worn off, and only the most die-hard fans remained obsessed. This is the point where brands face a crossroads: continue to innovate and stimulate, or risk losing their most fervent followers to the next craze.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
One of the most well-documented examples of a brand with a cult following is Tesla. While Elon Musk’s company has intentionally created hype around its products, the intensity of its following seems to have taken on a life of its own. Tesla owners are known for their devotion, often going as far as to defend the brand from criticism and evangelize its superiority to non-owners.
Tesla taps into nearly all the psychological triggers mentioned above: it offers a sense of exclusivity with limited production, it aligns with progressive environmental values, and it delivers frequent new innovations that trigger the dopamine system. However, Tesla’s following also illustrates a key risk: radical loyalty can sometimes result in polarization. Some Tesla devotees can become so entrenched in their brand loyalty that they are immune to negative feedback or flaws in the product. This can create cognitive dissonance, where consumers justify their loyalty, even in the face of evidence that suggests the brand may not be as perfect as they believe.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
For brands that accidentally cultivate cult-like followings, the challenge is managing the fine line between leveraging this passionate base and avoiding its darker sides. Cult followings can backfire when brands fail to evolve, refuse to address criticism, or overhype every product release to the point of exhausting their consumers’ dopamine systems. As we’ve seen with the concept of the dopamine tax, consumers can only sustain their emotional and chemical investment in a brand for so long before fatigue sets in.
Brands must remain adaptable, continuously offering new experiences, maintaining transparency, and above all, staying connected to their core values. Cult followings can be beneficial, but they require careful management to avoid burning out consumers or pushing them away when the brand fails to meet heightened expectations.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
One of the more intriguing aspects of consumer behavior is how the brain processes rewards, particularly through the release of dopamine. While dopamine gives consumers that rush of pleasure when they anticipate a purchase, it also imposes what is known as a dopamine tax. This concept refers to the diminishing returns that consumers experience after the high of their initial purchase.
The dopamine tax plays a significant role in how cult followings evolve. As brands continue to deliver highly anticipated products or experiences, the consumers' dopamine response is taxed over time—they need more novelty, more exclusivity, or more alignment with their identity to achieve the same level of pleasure. Brands that fail to meet this escalating demand may find their once-devoted followers moving on to the next dopamine-inducing experience.
The Stanley Cup craze once again provides a compelling example. While consumers were initially ecstatic about securing the limited-edition Stanley Cups, the heightened anticipation for new releases soon took a toll. The subsequent iterations of the product, while still popular, failed to generate the same dopamine spike as the first edition. The novelty had worn off, and only the most die-hard fans remained obsessed. This is the point where brands face a crossroads: continue to innovate and stimulate, or risk losing their most fervent followers to the next craze.
We have full documentation for this accordion component here. You can use it to edit this component —or to build your own accessible accordion from scratch.
